(Side Note: I started this earlier today, but the market has interrupted my thought process (hahahaha, yeeeaaaaa, like I HAVE a THOUGHT PROCESS!), anyway, read the article link to Dean Mouscher and I'll be back to this some time tonight or tomorrow morning with the "numbers")
You could also call the picture "BOOOOOOOORING", for I must be bored out of my mind to come up with a title like that. Sigh, I haven't watched the Oscar's in at LEAST 30 years, wad ever, and I didn't break my streak last night, however I WAS glad to see Sandra won, although it reminds me of my mortality, for I thought she was a young chick, I didn't know she was 45, SIGH!
Anyway, the boredom continues as the futures are almost dead flat this morning, it appears there hasn't been any M&A activity over the weekend to drive us higher, the ROACH's, which actually might end of being GOOD as Da Boyz may test the upper ends of BOTH sides of the support and resistance area's intraday, rather than just do that god awful grind higher.
So, I get a wild hair up my ass this weekend and decide to clean the past issues of SFO, Futuresmag, Futures and Options Trader Magazine, etc etc etc, off of my coffee table, that have been accumulating there for about ten years. I usually mark the articles in them that I thought were interesting with their advertisement cards or wad ever, so I went through all the articles just to see what I thought was interesting a few years ago, hahaha, good stuff, ANYWAY, I came across this article by 'Dean Mouscher' in Futures Mag,
Scalping option gammas , and Lo and Behold I found out what I was doing.
SIGH, I some times do things that I don't really know WHY I'm doing them, it's just kind of second nature, and I don't really even have a word for what it is, but after reading the article a couple of times (I'm on my third read today since it appears I won't have any thing to do today, roachey boring market), I realized I'm doing kind of a hybrid of what he talks about, that is I'm scalping gamma in order to remain net neutral, but rather than using the under lying equity I use options to do the dirty trick, and what REALLY amazed me is that I was not paying any attention to "Gamma", I was doing it all off of the Delta's based on my finger counting methods, which is all my limited, and rapidly eroding, brain power will let me do.
This caught my attention because my Delta was getting all out of whack in the Q "positions", and I made a couple of big moves in the June position on friday to try and bring them into line a little better (I still haven't completely filled the September position, YET, although with volatility this low I will probably finish it today), but what's really bugging me is the stupid short call positions, which is all I'm left with on the "Gamma" side since I unloaded the short puts, IE I'm to one sided, which is because I'm counting on a BIG, QUICK reversal so I can cover the short calls and go the other way. This ain't happening of course, as we grind higher, which is causing me to roll the short calls higher, IE I'm losing money on them on the cover, but the higher strike covers the difference in the loss and what I originally sold them for, plus some, and to be honest I really don't care about them that much, as I never get into an options position in which I can't just let the short position be called away if I don't want to take the cover, IE I never have an options position that I can't cover on the base equity balance in my account, IE I'm NOT margined to the hilt ( IE IE, a sure receipe for disaster).
11:15am: Ok, so, for the base position I take a deep in the money long call and long put position, to pay as little "time premium" as I can, because my whole life is basically based on what I now know to be "gamma" scalping to try and pay for the premium, in the hopes that the Q's make a 10% move or so, either way, so eventually the base stike for either the call or put gets far enough in the money to start trading one for one with the under lying Q's, with unlimited profit potential should the move in one direction continue far enough, and hopefully I completely pay for the premium with the scalping so I never have to worry about the position losing any money, period. Now try and ignore whether or not it's totally stupid to take a position like this anyway, I mean, most people would just gamble on one direction or the other, which I actually DO that, but I do it to my strength, which is selling or shorting things, which I can't do in my IRA accounts on the under lying equity, but I CAN by doing it with options, IE short calls and puts (don't ask me why the dumb ass SEC deemed all this to be proper behavior for us little retail guys, it's beyond me why they do what they do), so all my scalping is by shorting options.
Anyway, these were the numbers before the start of today on the June position, you have to understand Dean's article to know what these mean, the Delta on the 41 calls was .87, Gamma was .0477, Delta on the 48 puts was (.57), Gamma (.0881). See, I was long Delta on the calls, or "gamma" as Dean would call it, and in danger of losing what I made on them should Da Boyz decide they've had enough of their fun and start taking us back down, the total Delta was +.30. Now what I've since realized from that article, is that the "gamma" only applies to the "underlying", but in my case I'm using options in place of the "underlying", and thus I don't really think the "gamma" applies to me, unless I take a "gamma" position with deep in the money counter plays, like puts in place of being short the stock, BUT, I don't like to do that, what I like to do is contain my short calls and puts to just "outside the box", the box being the limits of 41 to 48, so when I'm short calls, I'm shorting, in this case, the 49's, to make sure that in the REMOTE possibility I'm wrong (hahahahahahaha, yeeeeeeeaaaaa, like THAT would ever happen) and get trapped in them until expiration, I will still make money on the over all position.
Anyway, I'm as tired of this stupid post as you are, to get to the gist, those 49 calls I shorted have a Delta of .30, which is actually -(.30) in the context of the position, which means those calls (at least, for the moment) are in perfect sync with keeping the whole position Delta Neutral, which is what I wanted in the first place, meaning I don't have to do a damn thing if I don't want to. I only mention the whole thing because I really didn't think about it until after I read the article, it kind of stoked me out that I actually had done some thing half ass right based just kind of on instinct.