If your like me, and looking for things that might jive with the past patterns, I'm looking at a viable candidate. At the first red circle on the left side we made our first pivot high after the dump out of April, we then dumped into the "first" major low ("first", as in there's a second and third to come, hahahaha), we then rallied up and stopped dead nuts on the down trend line, in the first green circle on the left, this of course is exactly what we are doing right now, a high in August at the red circle on the right, dump, then the current rally that stopped dead nuts on the "new" down trend line. Welp, if history does indeed repeat itself, we, "should", wallow around a few days, then come back up, and break through the trend line on the next attempt, just like we did in July. Hey, it makes perfect sense to me, which naturally scares the shit out of me.

I know you didn't ask, but I'm going to offer it anyway, my opinion of BAC that is. Now, I screw around with this thing all the time, as Uncle Ben has made it perfectly clear that he's going to save the bond holders of the major Wall Street firms, NO MATTER WHAT IT COST THE TAX PAYER! So, just like all those firms, even though it's insolvent, the possibility of BK is, "probably", pretty remote.
Anyway, this thing is in a terriffic down trend channel, and friday it hit the upper end of it almost on a gnat's ass, and left a kind of modified GraveStone doji, and after the news came out this morning about the lies regarding the European "NON-stress-tests", it gapped down with the rest of the banks (in some thing of a surprise, to me at least, is JPM is actually down MORE than BAC, maybe they have more exposure to those Stress-Less European banks), setting up a very nice Island reversal. In "Theory", this thing should go back down to the bottom of the channel (unless of course, it gets saved by whom ever it is that has been saving the indexes at critical levels), about $11.50, before it finds it's next bottom, but Theory is great and reality sucks, so based on some of the prior patterns at it's bottoms, I could see it break the prior low from five days ago, scare the shit out of every one who is long of it, then bounce back up, just like it did at a lot of those previous lows where I drew the red line under them. If it's going to go higher, it usually gets a couple of bounce around days in that area before moving higher, BUT, if it's going to go even lower, it usually goes RIGHT THROUGH the previous low, as shown in the red circles, it's actually pretty easy to read it at times. One other thing it generally does at a "bottom", is get a volume spike, as shown in the top chart, the last low, five days ago, had a slight volume up tick, but it was on a green bar, so it wasn't on a wash out day.
Of course, if your actually interested in being an "investor", you might just want to wait until it breaks that upper trend line with authority, rather than try and be a slimey bottom fisher like me.
5AM: The futures took a turn for the worse early this morning, as Europe came to a shocking, SHOCKING I TELL YA, revelation that the so called "STRESS TEST" they did, was a stinking JOKE, "Stock futures fall on fresh European bank concerns",
http://yhoo.it/b5tCxS , hahahaha, it's not like every one of the worse case senarios that we based OUR "stress test" on the Wall Street banks here, haven't been already violated! The whole reason we rallied off the March 09' lows was because our maaaaaaavelous Government told the banks to lie, and take all the bad shit off their balance sheets, other wise, THEY'D ALL BE STINKING BROKE! Wad ever.
Anyway, the five minute chart at the top has a cool little triangle working on it, "traditional" triangle analysis says we SHOULD break to the down side out of it, BUT, I have no doubt Da Boyz will find some peice of lousy economic news to pump it higher instead. The 60 minute has a big VOID under us, that goes back down to the release of the lousy payroll report Friday before the open, which brings up a sentence I found in that article above interesting, "A barrage of mostly better-than-anticipated economic data sent stocks sharply higher last week.", the key phrase there is "better-than-anticipated", not GOOD mind you, just better than what the "experts" generally miss their guess's on.
With the gap down, DOW down about 50 points, this could set up all those dreaded little terms I mentioned this weekend, like Island Reversal, Abandoned Baby or Evening Star, take your pick, which, NORMALLY, lead to big declines, especially since we are coming off of over bought conditions, and, we failed right at the major down trend line, BUT, with Da Street insisting on driving us higher by trying their best to perpetrate the "climbing the wall of worry" bull shit with their yakking screaming talking heads on the MSM outlets, it wouldn't surprise me at all to see ANOTHER magic save, and we some how manage to close it positive today, sigh, wad ever, some one wake me when it's over.

Robert McHugh sent me his latest weekend advertisement, his comments are below, but he's talking about a comparison of patterns between 2008 and now, I don't get his service but I can pretty much figure it out on my own, as if it's not obvious to any one. We had a similar down sloping head and shoulders pattern back then, and what's amazing is the time frames, almost exactly the same as far as what months are involved, and the plunge started the first week in October of that year. The only difference I see is TSV was in a better configuration back then than it is now. Wad ever, here's the rest of his cheerie comments:
"Markets are about to plunge. We show our subscribers a host of indicators and patterns this weekend supporting this view. Listen, I'm not telling you stocks are about to plunge, the market is telling all of us that it is about to plunge. Soon. We urge you to read the weekend report in its entirety at www.technicalindicatorindex.com as there is so much analysis we cannot possibly begin to do it justice in this summary.
This weekend we show our subscribers several interesting Bearish developments. We present our next phi mate turn date, and note two other cycle turn dates pointing to a sharp decline. We discuss when these turn dates are scheduled to arrive.
We also present a study of market performance in the September to November period during years in which mid-term elections are occurring. Markets have this set up once again right now. We show several of those charts in this weekend's expanded report at www.technicalindicatorindex.com
An official confirmed Hindenburg Omen stock market crash warning remains on the clock, and in effect until December 2010.
We also show an analog this weekend on page 23 comparing the price moves in 2008 versus 2010. The waves are amazingly very close, nearly identical in direction, time, turn dates, and extent of moves. If this pattern continues, a plunge is next.
Friday's release of the August unemployment and non-farm payroll numbers showed significant deterioration in the employment picture, but shamelessly, the mainstream financial media spun the terrible figures positively as if their declarations can alter reality. Here is the truth, using just the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own figures: There was a loss of 500,000 full time jobs in the month of August. Bet you didn't hear that anywhere. Now, if you add to that number the 150,000 new jobs the U.S. has to create just to break even with population growth, we see the shortfall of full time jobs in August was 650,000. This is an astonishingly awful number. We are headed for the second Great Depression of the past 100 years and this is a big reason why. Central Planner policies are failing. We present a more detailed analysis of the employment picture in this weekend's report.
The VIX has generated a set-up for a sell signal. This weekend's report discusses how this happened, and what it means. We show the history of this indicator over the past three years. We can tell you that VIX sell signals are rare and were reliable during 2008, 2009 and 2010. In each instance, there was a stock market decline after the sell signal was generated. We show each of these signals and the corresponding decline in the Industrials after the sell signals.
When we add this coming sell signal to the pile of dangerous indicators and patterns occurring at this time, one has to be very concerned that the odds of a plunge are getting pretty high. The Hindenburg Omen is still on the clock, a six observation official and confirmed stock market crash warning signal.
We discuss how market volatility, including sharp up days, preceded the 1987 and 2008 stock market crashes, and that we are seeing similar volatility now in 2010.
On page 15 we show a chart that demonstrates how the 50 and 200 day moving averages have stopped 7 out of the past 9 rallies in 2010. Prices sit at their 200 day moving average again Friday, September 3rd. This is a strong resistance spot.
On page 16 we show that the Monthly MACD in the Wilshire 5000, essentially the entire stock market, has formed a dangerous Bell Curve topping pattern.
On pages 17 through 19 we show the latest readings from our Primary Trend Indicator and its companion 20 month/40 month confirming indicator.
On page 23 we show an analog comparing 2008's price behavior (which ended in a crash) with 2010's. The comparison is alarming. It means market psychology is similar now as it was in 2008."
"Henry Ford was right. A prosperous economy requires that workers be able to buy the products that they produce. This is as true in a global economy as a national one." - John J. Sweeney
How true, and I also believe that old man Ford thought that mass producing "AFFORDABLE" cars that every American could buy was the road to success, and I think it worked, unlike NOW, when those stinking cars cost a fricking fortune, and only the RB's that work for the UAW can afford them, the average worker in the country that makes $50k a year certainly can't afford them, although he may THINK he can, hahahahahaha! The could "AFFORD" them of course, when their housing equity blew up and they were taking second trust deeds out on their house, so they could "AFFORD" it, but not any more.
As I am wont to do on long holiday weekends, I piddled around with some "portfolio" thoughts this weekend, here's one I came up with. "IF", you started your portfolio the last week of December 07', right before the huge crash in 08', AND, you started with 100K, AND, you invested equal amounts into the SPY and TLT, and adjusted the share count based on the next LOWER number of shares based on the 100 minimum share lots, you would have brought 300 shares of the SPY and 500 shares of the TLT, THEN, you take the balance, which would have been about 10K in this instance, and brought the VIX, you would have had 500 shares of the VIX. You then, "REBALANCE", on the last trading day of each year, where you do the SPY/TLT split again with the same parameters, and buy X amount of VIX sharres with what ever you have left over. I'm not going to go through all the math on the rebalancing, do it yourself, but if you had done that, your portfolio would now be worth $123,800, vs $70,000 if you had just held the SPY. This does NOT include the average 3% dividend you would have gotten in the SPY/TLT split, which would have added $8,000 to your portfolio, making it $131,800. This does not include any minor little trading ideas you may have come up with, like selling your VIX shares when they hit $90, as you lost half of that amount by waiting to rebalance in December of 08'. Plus, it doesn't include any minor little things like selling OTM calls every month on all of those items, or even weekly calls like they have now on the SPY and VXX.
Speaking of the VXX (I was, wasn't I??), Bill Luby sounds pretty excited about the new volatility product, VQT,
http://vixandmore.blogspot.com/ , it's basically going to be a dynamic hedging product that is actively managed, read about it your self, but my personal opinion is that I'm getting EXTREMELY concerned with all these Volatility products coming out, as I can't help but think they are going to totally screw with the basic idea's of the VIX and such with their daily rebalancing, or what ever they will be doing to manage their risk's.